Shirley C. Agrupis, Chairperson of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), and four other CHED officials are facing a graft and administrative misconduct complaint before the Ombudsman's Office in connection with the closure of several degree programs at campuses affiliated with a major private higher education network.
The complaint also names Agrupis' chief of staff and three regional directors, who oversee CHED operations across the country. The complaint charges them with violating Section 3 (e) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, as well as grave misconduct, oppression, and conduct detrimental to the best interests of the service.
According to the complaint, CHED issued resolutions in early March 2026 ordering the closure or phase-out of several degree programs at the network's three campuses, citing noncompliance with regulatory requirements for program administration, faculty, and facilities. The institution that operates the affected campuses claims it did not contest the closures. The complaint criticizes CHED's handling of the public rollout, specifically a series of advisories posted on CHED's official website and Facebook pages that directly named the affected campuses, with public comments left open on the posts.
The complaint claims that because the campuses share a single, well-known brand, the public misinterpreted the advisories as signaling the closure of the entire institution, rather than just a few programs at three of its approximately 150 campuses. Campus administrators across the network reportedly received a slew of concerned calls from students, parents, and partner institutions who believed the entire system was closing.
The complaint further alleges that the institution, through its representative, sent three separate written appeals to Chairperson Agrupis between late April and early May 2026, requesting that CHED coordinate an orderly transition and refrain from further public dissemination while the matter was being resolved. Each letter reportedly received an automated acknowledgment but no substantive response. Despite these requests, the complaint alleges that CHED re-published the advisories on Facebook in mid-May, this time with comments enabled, causing additional reputational and financial harm during a critical enrollment period.
According to the complaint, the resulting damage was significant enough to prompt inquiries from the institution's bank and media coverage, as well as contribute to lost enrollment opportunities that may be difficult to fully recover.
Beyond its own case, the complaint accuses CHED of applying regulatory standards unevenly. It cites public statements from a lawmaker and prior news reports to show that hundreds of teacher education programs across the country were flagged for closure due to licensure exam performance, but were not treated with the same urgency and public scrutiny as the campuses at the center of this complaint. The complainant claims that vigorous public action in one case and comparative inaction in others demonstrates bias.
The Ombudsman's complaint is not the institution's only legal action. The company has filed a complaint with the Anti-Red Tape Authority regarding CHED's failure to respond to its appeals. They are also seeking an injunction in a Quezon City trial court to prevent further dissemination of the advisories and recover ₱20 million in moral damages.








.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)



.jpg)
.jpg)


.jpg)
.jpg)






